What's In A Number - Economic Jihad

In my first post here on EOS, I wrote about the significance of the date of 9/11. Since then, it has become clear that not only do jihadists use anniversaries for attacks, but that the numbers in the dates themselves have significance; with the emphasis on odd numbers.

During the 9/11 hijackings, many more clues were given about which numbers hold significance. American Airlines flight 11 and 77 were hijacked. The London terrorist bombings occurred on July 7th (7/7). A United Airlines flight 175 was hijacked (read Sura II verse 175. For context sura II verse 174). Taking 175 and changing it to a date 17/5 (using the British calendar system of placing the date first, followed by month) we have the 17th of May. This was the date, in 1987, when Saddam launched an Exocet missle at the USS Stark, killing 37 sailors. Also the Madrid bombings were carried out on March the 11th 2004 (3/11).

The most famous flight of 9/11, United 93, became well known thanks to the heroic actions of its passengers as they learnt about the other hijackings that had taken place that day, and decided to fight their kidnappers ultimately crashing the plane in Pennsylvania. All the passengers on board died. But 93 was the year (1993) of the first WTC bombing.

However, the date of the 1993 bombing was February 26th. Obviously no odd numbers there. But on Feb 26th, 1989, the US army officially withdrew from Lebanon. On the same date in 1991, Saddam ordered the withdrawal of his occupying forces from Kuwait. Given the strong evidence that Iraq was involved in the first WTC bombing, this is more than likely the reason for the date of the first attempt to destroy the WTC.

But odd numbers don't only relate to terror operations. According to Islamic sources (PDF document) on shari'ah, an odd number of prayers must be recited during daily prayers. The entire first chapter (sura) of the Quar'an consists only of 7 short verses.

The terrorist 'Palestinian' leaders of the PA, attempted to have a Palestinian State declared in September of 2011 (thus 9/11). Achieving statehood would've meant a significant milestone in the Arabs war to exterminate Israel. The State of Palestine would be able to launch one war crimes investigation after another against Israel through the UN (and as we have seen, accusations of massacres in the past have been fabricated, the most successful of which being the Goldstone Report). In addition, Israel would have no legal authority to check shipments going in and out of the West Bank, effectively meaning the importing of any amount of weapons.

As for 9/11, in the Quar'an, Sura (chapter) 9 verse 111 is the most chilling. The verse talks about believers (Muslims) killing and being killed for Islam, and in exchange receiving paradise from Allah. Reading this verse, and the authoritative commentary along with it (Quar'an IEC 2nd edition. Commentary by Abdullah Yusuf Ali)), it's not hard to imagine these verses were going through the minds of the hijackers, in the run up to their mission.

In fact, chapter (sura) 9 in the Quar'an is one of the most violent of all. Muslims believe that the 9th chapter of the Quar'an came about in the 9th year of the hijra. Meaning it was written 9 years after Muhammad migrated from Mecca to Medina, and from his new base of operations in Medina set about planning how to conquer the rest of Arabia, and from there the rest of the Middle East and the world.

The Odd-Numbers Theory Today

On the last anniversary of 9/11 (the tenth anniversary), tensions were high as people were expecting some sort of attack given the significance of a decade passing since the attacks. But I remember positing the above theory and being skeptical that an attack would take place. Thankfully, an attack never came. But could that be because of what we now know above? Ten is obviously not an odd number...

Today, I received my copy of Secret Weapon by Kevin Freeman. In the book, Freeman explains not only how the Western economies are being destroyed using  financial products as weapons, but that we're in a final stage (the Third Act, as he calls it) of a monetary and fiscal attack.

Nobody could have missed the 2008 economic crash. But amazingly, Freeman reveals, It came on the 7th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, on September 11th, 2008.

Here is an important lecture by Freeman of his concepts, how economic terrorism works, and what happened in the 2008 economic meltdown.This has already been approved by US Congressmen, intelligence officials; and Freeman has now briefed the CIA.




Clearly the US is extremely vulnerable (in large part thanks to President Obama's stimulus, as well as the community organisers, with the help of President Clinton, overloading the housing markets). This ties together all the projects of George Soros, the Saudi sponsored al Qaeda's war on the US, and shari'ah finance. But the last remaining piece of the puzzle is when the final attack itself will occur?

Maybe a financial attack is connected to the upcoming 9/11 anniversary, which will be the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks 2001, maybe it won't be financial. But I am certain from the data above (and there is a lot more of it), that this anniversary (2012) will be a lot more significant than last year's 10th anniversary of 9/11.

The intention of writing this is not to cause alarm, but it is written in the hope of providing the relevant authorities a possible insight and key date in order to prepare. Hopefully the readers will also make some preparations too. To some, this may be hard to believe and easy to dismiss. Just like standing in downtown Manhattan on 10th September 2001, and telling people that the towers would be brought down the next day.

Only time will tell...

The Israel Illusion: A Warning To The West

As time goes by, defending Israel gets easier and easier, even though the demonization of Israel gets worse and worse. With things like Hamas posting videos and setting up websites to show how good life is in Gaza (to try and promote tourism), the claims of the anti-Israeli campaigners becomes more and more absurd. What isn’t absurd, however, and something far more sinister, are those still pushing the same narrative about Israeli brutality/oppression and 'Palestinian' victims, regardless of what happens on the ground.

Propaganda vs Reality

Whether it’s the types of unapologetic, open and unrestrained Anti-Semitic attacks on the streets of Europe, or mass terror operations (such as 7/7), the instant explanation by Muslims and their apologists is “it’s all because of Israel”.

Gaza City - What, no bomb damage??

So why do this? What is the purpose of portraying a wildly different reality of Israel? If the likes of the BDS mob were really about fighting against injustice, then surely the improvement in the quality of life of the so-called 'Palestinians' should ease the calls to boycott Israel. The reason this isn't happening reveals the true motives behind the Israel-apartheid/BDS campaigns and also the real face of the proponents of the Muslim/victim narrative.

If Arabs are shown not only to be living in decent conditions, but superb conditions, then there cannot very well be any justification for acts of aggression against Israel, let alone against Jews around the world by Muslims. 

Gaza Market Stall - Plentiful Supply Of Fresh Fruit And Vegetables

In the beginning, the "Israel=evil" campaign was simply to portray Israel in a negative light. But as time has passed, and as the condition of the so-called 'Palestinians' improved (which has a lot to do with Israeli leaders appeasing their diplomatic counterparts in the EU and US as Arabs murder Jews with impunity), another purpose for this anti-Israel Orwellian version of reality became apparent: Islamisation.

The Middle East isn't the issue. The further the 'Palestinian' campaign is pushed, the further Islamisation increases.

In other words, the 'Free Palestine' campaign is the stealth jihad.

What is the difference between the fabricated call of 'Israel atrocities' in the West and decades of Arab dictators starting wars with Israel in order for them to distract attention from problems at home?

As it turns out, our previous understanding of this dynamic was only half the story. We now know from an increasing stock of quotations by Islamic clerics that waging war against Jews actually holds religious connotations for Muslims. So the fact that Arab dictators in years gone by have called their subjects to arms wasn't a successful attempt to distract their populations, it was seen by those populations as their leaders engaging in something good, morally, according to an Islam.

In this sense we can see exactly the same thing with the pro-'Palestinian' campaign. As many commentators and analysts have noted before, it's not so much that the 'Palestinian' camp are pro-Palestinian, it's that they are anti-Israel. The campaign to create a 'Palestinian' identity and country isn't so much about creating a 'Palestinian' state and identity, it's about destroying the Jewish state and Jewish identity/religion.

The Israel illusion, therefore, is a double-edged sword whereby on the one hand it is used as a war against the Jewish state, and an excuse in the West to legitimise a campaign of threats, violence and demands that the victim society work hard to please the Muslim community, or else. This is moving in the direction of Islamic societies where Muslims are superior in standing, and the infidels live in fear.

A few decades down the line and we can now see the results. Less than 100 years since the Holocaust, Europeans (and a growing minority of Americans), would be very happy to see Israel disappear. But the reason for this is that they see the disappearance of Israel as being the key to solving their own Muslim-violence problems within their own borders. 

If most people were informed about the reality, they'd very quickly realise the lack of difference between terrorism carried out in the West and terrorism carried out against Israel, people would quickly realise what is being perpetrated upon them.

At the heart of all this is a very basic psychological tactic. The 'Free Palestinian', BDS and Islamic terror campaigns work in tandem to seek to establish a link between the victim society's suffering and Jews. So if the cause for Britain (for example) being the recipient of Islamic aggression lies elsewhere, in some supposed foreign policy decision of the British government, then the solution lies in British foreign policy. Therefore the logical step in order to stop the Muslims targeting them, so the average Brit might think, is to join the chorus of condemnation against Israel and try to make the British government become hostile to Israel. 

Psychologically, condemning a 'far away place' feels so much safer and more convenient than confronting uncomfortable truths at home, not least because this also wins some superficial reward buying into the alleged purpose of standing up for human rights (while remaining silent when Hamas and Fatah murder their own people mercilessly). Thus condemning Israel (really Jews) is the Western infidel’s get-out clause. While the Muslim missionaries deny they are angry at Jews, only Israeli policies, so too does the infidel establish the same excuse in their own mind, more in an effort to convince themselves, than anyone else.  

But in the meantime, however, acts of Muslim violence continue to be carried out in the name of Israel (or do I mean Islam?), and the more the victims condemn Israel, the more Jewish owned businesses close (BDS), the more society turns a blind eye to attacks on Jews (and others), the more they adopt Islamic values and the notion that whatever Muslims demand must be given becomes the norm. The more noxious the European anger at "what they have to suffer because of Israel", the less offended they are by anti-Semitism and people who hold anti-Semitic beliefs. While Jews or Israelis who hold hostile feelings towards Arabs or Muslims are dismissed as being partisan 'because of your war with the Palestinians', Muslims who hold hostile views against Jews are seen as 'understandable'.

The more fictitious a society's beliefs about Israel (adopting the BBC's Muslim-innocent-victim narrative about the Arab-Israel war), the more likely they are to, eventually, find the Jew and infidel-hatred found in Islamic holy texts appealing. 

The Israel excuse has been created as a psychological tool in order to delay the victim society from facing reality and taking responsibility as citizens of the free world (if they ever wake up at all). The Israel illusion is a convenient way of ignoring the fact that Muslims are on an all out war, not only against Israel but against all infidel nations, and that while the majority of Muslims don't support the terrorist’s aims (Islamic rule - Shari'ah), this is not the vast majority, it is a little over half who say they do not support terrorism. 

Fmr London mayor Ken Livingstone with Hitler-praising cleric Yusuf al Qaradawi, the spiritual head of the Muslim Brotherhood

Clearly, the vast majority of Muslims are more offended by people who criticise their religion than terrorist actions in the name of their religion. Despite Muslims saying they don't support terrorism, we see the kinds of support Muslims give at elections to dangerous figures such as George Galloway and Ken Livingstone (in the UK) when they run for office. We see politicians who stand up for Israel having to go into hiding and receive police protection because Muslims threaten their lives; or politicians that are simply Jewish are targeted. 

This is all perfectly consistent with the warnings given about Islam and Islamic immigration. Muslims in Europe are completely unified with their supposedly more ‘radical’ co-religionists in the Middle East who chant 'one nation for a holocaust' at football matches.

Muslims in the Middle East have just overthrown their tyrannical secular leaders, thanks to America's help, and are replacing them with puritanical tyrants hell bent on bringing the return of the caliphate (for global jihad). The riots witnessed in Britain in 2011, and in Paris in 2005/6 is a taste of things to come, as the Muslims under religious obligation subjugate their host populations to assert Islamic authority.

Israel is not the cause, it’s an excuse.

Standing against Israel won't make things better, it will only make them worse. Not for Israel, but for you. 

Eurabia Comes To Israel

Last night on Holocaust Memorial Day in Israel, another story of attempted murder showed the dangers of having Muslims live with non-Muslims.

In the Arab dominated area of East Jerusalem, a young Jewish man was stabbed by a Muslim. This is just one of a series of attacks on this minority of Jews living among Arabs. What is clear is that while elsewhere in Israel some 1.5 million Israeli Arabs live far better lives than Arabs anywhere else in the Mid East, the Arabs in Israel do not want Jews living among them.

The other day I was on a mini-bus and noticed the driver's erratic behaviour on the road. Aggressive, he started driving off before passengers had gotten off (before they'd managed to fully step off the bus); elsewhere in the news we hear of multiple hit-and-runs. Jews being mown down in traffic 'accidents' with the assailant's identity remaining a mystery.

The other week, again on a bus, a passenger sitting on the other side of the aisle from me was talking on her cell phone. Nobody complained, she wasn't loud or speaking for long. But as soon as she started saying good bye and 'Happy Passover', the driver yelled at her from the front of the bus, in an Arabic accent, that it was disturbing him.

I sat in a restaurant in the middle of Tel Aviv, only to feel murderous vibes from the owners. On further 'inspection' I notice they are not Jews. I walk past building sites with Arab labourers and I see them trying to chat up Jewish girls as they pass by. In other news I hear some 150,000 Jewish women are held against their will in Arab homes after being seduced by Arab men.

Elsewhere in Europe, we know the patterns of migration all too well. The Muslims move in, and when there are enough of them, the jihad starts. A variety of crimes, paedophilia and rapes ensure the non-Muslim inhabitants eventually flee thus creating a ghetto, which become breeding grounds for terrorism. And with the authorities' showing 'cultural sensitivity' to Islam's covert tactics of war, the non-Muslim majority is on a losing streak.

With this record of failure, it begs the question why the EU is now imposing the same fate on Israel.

Arabs are everywhere.

There are many Ethiopians, Sudanese refugees (but also non-refugee illegal immigrants), and Filippino and Thai migrant workers here too. I don't pay attention to them because they don't want to kill every last one of us. All they want to do is work, send money home, and get on with their lives. With the exception of the illegal infiltrators, they don't pose a problem to the safety of Israelis. And they do jobs Israelis themselves don't do, such as care giving for our elderly or cleaning dishes in kitchens. As such, they help the economy and many other people. And this is an ideal scenario which benefits both the host nation as well as the migrants. However this is not the case when it comes to the vast majority of Muslims, no matter where they reside.

Up until recently, the Arab and Jewish communities have kept to their own towns, cities and villages. So why the sudden change? By chance I found an article which made me realise what's going on. A secret EU plan to impose mass integration in Israel between its Muslims and non-Muslims seeing as this has obviously worked so well for Europe.

In keeping with the Arab rejection of a Jewish state, the EU report refused requests from Israel that Arab leaders show good intentions before this process begin and recognise the Jewish State's right to exist. It says "We do not believe that recognition of Israel as a Jewish State should detract in any way from the vision of equality for all its citizens enshrined in its founding documents". This is using the empty language of multiculturalism to force Israel to accept what the Arabs themselves refuse to accept.

And obviously, with Netanyahu as PM this plan has seen no resistance.

Palestinian boy gives Nazi salute with Israeli Arab MK Ahmad Tibi smiling in the background

The report also suggested that the EU file an official protest every time a bill discriminating against Arabs passes a second reading in the Knesset. Could this be related to the failure to implement Israel's pledge of allegiance? Since this failure, we have seen Arab MKs become more and more belligerent, being photographed with members of Hamas, being more open in their support for the destruction of the Jewish State. But the real reason for the report is found in hidden language, and it is because of a breakdown in peace talks.

This is interesting because it shows that no matter what happens with peace talks, Israel's enemies in the EU wish to bring Jews and Muslims together, no matter what the dangers on the ground. We can see the EU favours the whims of Muslims over the basic human rights of Europeans, so what rights do Jews have in their own country?

It is also further proof that the peace process is thinly veiled diplomatic weapon.

Last time Bibi was PM back in the late '90s, he faced pressure in the form of Bill Clinton. Clinton was desperate for peace talks and some sort of a break-through as he needed to deflect attention away from Monica and the sex scandal. In Israel's current President, Shimon Peres, Clinton found a willing acomplice.

Before Netanyahu agreed to withdraw Jews from the holy city of Hebron, as well as withdraw control over Bethlehem, and others, Shimon Peres said this to Bibi in knesset, imploring him to finalise the Hebron Agreement: "If you want peace, there will be blood and agony and murder." Peres went on with various hyperbole "I prefer the agony of peace to the blood of war." "War has a heavy price" he said "so does peace". "Our generation must undergo the agonies of peace".

Of course, Peres would pay absolutely nothing if Netanyahu agreed to withdraw. Peres did not live in Hebron, and neither was he a Christian in Bethlehem. But he would receive many rewards and friendship from Clinton for helping the beleaguered American president.

The actions taken back then are still being felt today. The people on the ground still suffer. Shimon Peres does not, and neither does anyone in the EU thus more is implemented.

In my last post I wrote about Peace Now's objection to Jews moving into Arab areas (which were previously Jewish anyway). And this just goes to show that the Left's apartheid policy is no different to the Muslims: that migration only go one way.

Twenty years ago, Hollywood was making films warning non-Muslim women of the dangers of marrying a Muslim. Now they say you're racist if you're hostile to Muslims, even with information such as this:



What is clear is that no matter what our enemies attempt to impose on us, the government under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu is the weakest in all of Israel's history. We are now paying the price for Netanyahu continually offering peace talks to Abbas in the face of non-stop attacks. From the flytilla to border penetrations, when Bibi thinks he's being clever by showing the international community just how peace-loving he is, and how much he's willing to talk to the enemy, he's calling Abbas' bluff and showing the international community the reality; that Israel is for peace, while our enemies are not.

But in reply, the international community call Bibi's bluff and simply turn the screws even further, putting forward yet more dangerous plans on Israel, which the Israeli left accept and Bibi dare not refuse. The EU reveal their true colours time and time again, but Israel's leaders are too weak or too corruptible. In terms of Middle Eastern diplomacy, when Netanyahu offers peace talks in the face of Abbas' continued war on Israel, he shows Abbas weakness and invites yet more attacks and inspires Abbas to threaten another attempt at a Palestinian statehood bid, unless more concessions are given to him by Bibi. The more Netanyahu concedes, the worse things get.

This is the Netanyahu nightmare.