What's In A Number - Economic Jihad

In my first post here on EOS, I wrote about the significance of the date of 9/11. Since then, it has become clear that not only do jihadists use anniversaries for attacks, but that the numbers in the dates themselves have significance; with the emphasis on odd numbers.

During the 9/11 hijackings, many more clues were given about which numbers hold significance. American Airlines flight 11 and 77 were hijacked. The London terrorist bombings occurred on July 7th (7/7). A United Airlines flight 175 was hijacked (read Sura II verse 175. For context read sura II verse 174). All three numbers of flight 175 are obviously odd numbers. Also the Madrid bombings were carried out on March the 11th 2004 (3/11).

The most famous flight of 9/11, United 93, became well known thanks to the heroic actions of the passengers as they learnt about the other hijackings that had taken place, and then agreed to fight their kidnappers, ultimately crashing the plane in Pennsylvania. All the passengers on board died. But 93 was the year (1993) of the first WTC bombing.

However, the date of the 1993 bombing was February 26th. Obviously no odd numbers there. But on Feb 26th, 1989, the US army officially withdrew from Lebanon. On the same date in 1991, Saddam ordered the withdrawal of his occupying forces from Kuwait. Given the strong evidence that Iraq was involved in the first WTC bombing, this is more than likely the reason for the date of the first attempt to destroy the WTC.

But odd numbers don't only relate to terror operations. According to Islamic sources (PDF document) on shari'ah, an odd number of prayers must be recited during daily prayers. The entire first chapter (sura) of the Quar'an consists only of 7 short verses.

The terrorist 'Palestinian' leaders of the PA, attempted to have a Palestinian State declared in September of 2011 (thus 9/11). Achieving statehood would've meant a significant milestone in the Arabs war to exterminate Israel. The State of Palestine would be able to launch one war crimes investigation after another against Israel through the UN (and as we have seen, accusations of massacres in the past have been fabricated, the most successful of which being the Goldstone Report). In addition, Israel would have no legal authority to check shipments going in and out of the West Bank, effectively meaning the importing of any amount of weapons.

As for 9/11, in the Quar'an, Sura (chapter) 9 verse 111 is the most chilling. The verse talks about believers (Muslims) killing and being killed for Islam, and in exchange receiving paradise from Allah. Reading this verse, and the authoritative commentary along with it (Quar'an IEC 2nd edition. Commentary by Abdullah Yusuf Ali)), it's not hard to imagine these verses were going through the minds of the hijackers, in the final days before their mission.

In fact, chapter (sura) 9 in the Quar'an is one of the most violent of all. It is believed that the 9th chapter of the Quar'an came about in the 9th year of the hijra. Meaning it was written 9 years after Muhammad migrated from Mecca to Medina, and from his new base of operations in Medina set about planning how to conquer the rest of Arabia, and from there the rest of the Middle East and the world.

On the last anniversary of 9/11 (the tenth anniversary), tensions were high as people were expecting some sort of attack given the significance of a decade passing since the attacks. Thankfully, an attack never came. But could that be because of what we now know above?

Today, I received my copy of Secret Weapon by Kevin Freeman. In the book, Freeman explains not only how the Western economies are being destroyed using  financial products as weapons, but that we're in a final stage (the Third Act, as he calls it) of a monetary and fiscal attack. The final attack is yet to come.

Nobody could have missed the 2008 economic crash. It came on the 7th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, on September 11th itself.

It started in the US and very quickly spread around the world. Of course, what happens to the US affects us all.

If the US economy crashes, just one example will be that it will not be able to afford a military (putting aside variables for the moment, such as the US servicemen and women not doing what they do for the money!). If that happens then trade routes and strategically important areas around the world become much more vulnerable; from the South China Seas, to the Suez Canal.

Here is an important lecture by Freeman of his concepts, how economic terrorism works, and what happened in the 2008 economic meltdown.This has already been approved by US Congressmen, intelligence officials; and Freeman has now briefed the CIA.



Clearly with the US economy on its last legs, with debt at a record breaking level, the US is extremely vulnerable (in large part thanks to President Obama's stimulus, as well as the community organisers, with the help of President Clinton, overloading the housing markets). This ties together all the projects of George Soros, the Saudi sponsored al Qaeda's war on the US, and shari'ah finance. But the last remaining piece of the puzzle is when the final attack itself will occur?

I predict that if this attack occurs, it will come on 9/11 of this year (2012). The eleventh anniversary of the 9/11, 2001 attacks. What form these attacks will take is open to conjecture. Obviously as attacks in the past have done, they are designed to cause panic, using any of the ideas laid out by Freeman, and/or with the left being utilised on the street level with the Occupy Movement becoming more violent.

The intention of writing this is not to cause alarm, but it is written in the hope of providing the relevant authorities a possible insight and key date in order to prepare. Hopefully the readers will also make some preparations too. To some, this may be hard to believe and easy to dismiss. Just like standing in downtown Manhattan on 10th September 2001, and telling people that the towers would be brought down the next day.

Israel: A Warning To The West

As time goes by, defending Israel gets easier and easier, even though the demonization of Israel gets worse and worse. With things like Hamas posting videos and setting up websites to show how good life is in Gaza (to try and promote tourism), the claims of the anti-Israeli campaigners becomes more and more absurd. What isn’t absurd, however, and something far more sinister, are those still pushing the ‘Muslim-equals-victim’ narrative.

Whether it’s the types of unrestrained Anti-Semitic behaviour on the streets of Europe, only equalled in Islamic countries, or mass terror operations (such as 7/7) the Pavlovian response in Britain (and elsewhere) is “it’s all because of Israel”. If a vicar, rabbi, Hindu, or whoever is assaulted on Britain’s streets by Muslims, the knee-jerk reaction by Muslims and their apologists is “it’s all because of Israel”. Thus a link is established in the mind of the victim society that there is payback for their ambivalence over how Israel allegedly treats Muslims.

An Olympic-sized swimming pool in Gaza City
Large enough for a flotilla

It is often said that Israel is just an excuse for Muslims to act violently, and that's true but only half the picture. What is really happening is Israel is the excuse to rally under a "pro-Palestinian" flag in order to Islamise the West. Israel therefore provides a seemingly legitimate excuse for the violent Muslim assault on the West and its values.

This is why we'll never see the Arabs accept a peace agreement. The mission to destroy Israel not only helps the continuously warring Middle East to unite, it also provides a far too valuable propaganda tool in which to unite all Muslims in their other, more important project, Islamising the West.

The way this works is multifaceted, and all about psychological warfare. Because the media have now become complicit in aiding and abetting Muslim grievances, they portray Islam as benign, and Muslims as victims. Therefore the notion that Muslims possess a skill or understanding of an issue far deeper than our own, is something totally off the radar of the media's established portrayal of Muslims. But Muslims have always had a sophisticated understanding of how to psychologically manipulate their enemy, and this has been a skill born out of experience from holy texts which state that Muslims must terrorise the infidel. 

In the mind of the victim, if the cause for Britain being victimised lies elsewhere, so must the solution. Therefore the logical step in order to avoid being targeted is to join the chorus of condemnation against Israel. 

Psychologically, condemning a far away place feels so much safer and more convenient than confronting uncomfortable truths at home, not least because this also wins some superficial reward of thinking of oneself as virtuous. Thus condemning Israel (really Jews) is the Western infidel’s get-out clause. While the Muslim missionaries deny they are targeting Jews, only Israeli policies, so too does the infidel establish the same excuse in their minds (more in an effort to convince themselves, than anyone else).  

And this is an ideal situation, because in the meantime, acts of violence are carried out in the name of Israel (or do I mean Islam?), and the more the victims condemn Israel, the more Jewish owned businesses close (BDS), the more society turns a blind eye to attacks on Jews (and others), the more they adopt Islamic values and the notion that whatever Muslims do is legitimate.

The more noxious the European anger at "what they have to suffer because of Israel", the less offended they are by Anti-Semitism. The more fictitious their beliefs about Israel (adopting the BBC's Muslim-innocent-victim narrative about the Arab-Israel war), the more likely they are to eventually find what is written in Islamic holy texts appealing. 

The Israel excuse has been created as a psychological tool in order to delay the victim society from facing reality and taking responsibility as citizens of the free world. The Israel excuse is a convenient way of ignoring the fact that Muslims are not passive people (except when it comes to denouncing terror) and that the vast majority of Muslims do support the terrorist’s aims (Islamic rule - Shari'ah). They are offended by people who criticise Islam more than terrorist actions in the name of Islam. In contrast to what Muslims say about themselves, we see the kinds of support Muslims give to dangerous figures such as George Galloway and Ken Livingstone when they run for office. We see politicians who stand up for Israel having to go into hiding and receive police protection because Muslims threaten their lives; or politicians that are simply Jewish are targeted. 

This is all perfectly consistent with the warnings given about Islam and Islamic immigration. Muslims in Europe are completely unified with their supposedly more ‘radical’ co-religionists in the Middle East who chant 'one nation for a holocaust' at football matches.

Muslims in the Middle East have just overthrown their tyrannical secular leaders, thanks to America's help, and are replacing them with puritanical tyrants hell bent on bringing the return of the caliphate (for global jihad). The riots witnessed in Britain in 2011, and in Paris in 2005/6 is a taste of things to come, as the Muslims under religious obligation subjugate their host populations to assert Islamic authority.

Israel is not the cause, it’s an excuse.

Standing against Israel won't make things better, it will only make them worse. Not for Israel, but for you. 

Eurabia Comes To Israel

Last night on Holocaust Memorial Day in Israel, another story of attempted murder showed the dangers of having Muslims live with non-Muslims.

In the Arab dominated area of East Jerusalem, a young Jewish man was stabbed by a Muslim. This is just one of a series of attacks on this minority of Jews living among Arabs. What is clear is that while elsewhere in Israel some 1.5 million Israeli Arabs live far better lives than Arabs anywhere else in the Mid East, the Arabs in Israel do not want Jews living among them.

The other day I was on a mini-bus and noticed the driver's erratic behaviour on the road. Aggressive, he started driving off before passengers had gotten off (before they'd managed to fully step off the bus); elsewhere in the news we hear of multiple hit-and-runs. Jews being mown down in traffic 'accidents' with the assailant's identity remaining a mystery.

The other week, again on a bus, a passenger sitting on the other side of the aisle from me was talking on her cell phone. Nobody complained, she wasn't loud or speaking for long. But as soon as she started saying good bye and 'Happy Passover', the driver yelled at her from the front of the bus, in an Arabic accent, that it was disturbing him.

I sat in a restaurant in the middle of Tel Aviv, only to feel murderous vibes from the owners. On further 'inspection' I notice they are not Jews. I walk past building sites with Arab labourers and I see them trying to chat up Jewish girls as they pass by. In other news I hear some 150,000 Jewish women are held against their will in Arab homes after being seduced by Arab men.

Elsewhere in Europe, we know the patterns of migration all too well. The Muslims move in, and when there are enough of them, the jihad starts. A variety of crimes, paedophilia and rapes ensure the non-Muslim inhabitants eventually flee thus creating a ghetto, which become breeding grounds for terrorism. And with the authorities' showing 'cultural sensitivity' to Islam's covert tactics of war, the non-Muslim majority is on a losing streak.

With this record of failure, it begs the question why the EU is now imposing the same fate on Israel.

Arabs are everywhere.

There are many Ethiopians, Sudanese refugees (but also non-refugee illegal immigrants), and Filippino and Thai migrant workers here too. I don't pay attention to them because they don't want to kill every last one of us. All they want to do is work, send money home, and get on with their lives. With the exception of the illegal infiltrators, they don't pose a problem to the safety of Israelis. And they do jobs Israelis themselves don't do, such as care giving for our elderly or cleaning dishes in kitchens. As such, they help the economy and many other people. And this is an ideal scenario which benefits both the host nation as well as the migrants. However this is not the case when it comes to the vast majority of Muslims, no matter where they reside.

Up until recently, the Arab and Jewish communities have kept to their own towns, cities and villages. So why the sudden change? By chance I found an article which made me realise what's going on. A secret EU plan to impose mass integration in Israel between its Muslims and non-Muslims seeing as this has obviously worked so well for Europe.

In keeping with the Arab rejection of a Jewish state, the EU report refused requests from Israel that Arab leaders show good intentions before this process begin and recognise the Jewish State's right to exist. It says "We do not believe that recognition of Israel as a Jewish State should detract in any way from the vision of equality for all its citizens enshrined in its founding documents". This is using the empty language of multiculturalism to force Israel to accept what the Arabs themselves refuse to accept.

And obviously, with Netanyahu as PM this plan has seen no resistance.

Palestinian boy gives Nazi salute with Israeli Arab MK Ahmad Tibi smiling in the background

The report also suggested that the EU file an official protest every time a bill discriminating against Arabs passes a second reading in the Knesset. Could this be related to the failure to implement Israel's pledge of allegiance? Since this failure, we have seen Arab MKs become more and more belligerent, being photographed with members of Hamas, being more open in their support for the destruction of the Jewish State. But the real reason for the report is found in hidden language, and it is because of a breakdown in peace talks.

This is interesting because it shows that no matter what happens with peace talks, Israel's enemies in the EU wish to bring Jews and Muslims together, no matter what the dangers on the ground. We can see the EU favours the whims of Muslims over the basic human rights of Europeans, so what rights do Jews have in their own country?

It is also further proof that the peace process is thinly veiled diplomatic weapon.

Last time Bibi was PM back in the late '90s, he faced pressure in the form of Bill Clinton. Clinton was desperate for peace talks and some sort of a break-through as he needed to deflect attention away from Monica and the sex scandal. In Israel's current President, Shimon Peres, Clinton found a willing acomplice.

Before Netanyahu agreed to withdraw Jews from the holy city of Hebron, as well as withdraw control over Bethlehem, and others, Shimon Peres said this to Bibi in knesset, imploring him to finalise the Hebron Agreement: "If you want peace, there will be blood and agony and murder." Peres went on with various hyperbole "I prefer the agony of peace to the blood of war." "War has a heavy price" he said "so does peace". "Our generation must undergo the agonies of peace".

Of course, Peres would pay absolutely nothing if Netanyahu agreed to withdraw. Peres did not live in Hebron, and neither was he a Christian in Bethlehem. But he would receive many rewards and friendship from Clinton for helping the beleaguered American president.

The actions taken back then are still being felt today. The people on the ground still suffer. Shimon Peres does not, and neither does anyone in the EU thus more is implemented.

In my last post I wrote about Peace Now's objection to Jews moving into Arab areas (which were previously Jewish anyway). And this just goes to show that the Left's apartheid policy is no different to the Muslims: that migration only go one way.

Twenty years ago, Hollywood was making films warning non-Muslim women of the dangers of marrying a Muslim. Now they say you're racist if you're hostile to Muslims, even with information such as this:



What is clear is that no matter what our enemies attempt to impose on us, the government under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu is the weakest in all of Israel's history. We are now paying the price for Netanyahu continually offering peace talks to Abbas in the face of non-stop attacks. From the flytilla to border penetrations, when Bibi thinks he's being clever by showing the international community just how peace-loving he is, and how much he's willing to talk to the enemy, he's calling Abbas' bluff and showing the international community the reality; that Israel is for peace, while our enemies are not.

But in reply, the international community call Bibi's bluff and simply turn the screws even further, putting forward yet more dangerous plans on Israel, which the Israeli left accept and Bibi dare not refuse. The EU reveal their true colours time and time again, but Israel's leaders are too weak or too corruptible. In terms of Middle Eastern diplomacy, when Netanyahu offers peace talks in the face of Abbas' continued war on Israel, he shows Abbas weakness and invites yet more attacks and inspires Abbas to threaten another attempt at a Palestinian statehood bid, unless more concessions are given to him by Bibi. The more Netanyahu concedes, the worse things get.

This is the Netanyahu nightmare.

Segment of Israeli Society Endorses Apartheid

 

Since 2006, when former US President Jimmy (Dhimmi?) Carter published the most factually accurate book since the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, there has been a continued slander of Israel comparing it to the Apartheid of South Africa.

At long last the issue has been settled. There is a small segment of Israeli society in favour of Apartheid and has been outraged at a plan to increase integration of Arabs and Jews.

In last week’s Haaretz, an article was published entitled “Israel paving road to link East Jerusalem neighborhoods to city center”. And this was followed by the subheading: “New route would link northeast neighborhoods to capital's [sic] main Begin Boulevard; Peace Now: Plan is illegal use of occupied land, endangers two-state solution.”

Now barring for the moment that it is not illegally occupied by Jews, and neither is there a chance of any solution, let alone a two-state solution, let’s go along with Peace Now’s assertions...

If we’re to understand correctly, the extreme leftist Peace Now NGO believes that because, at some point in the future, east and central Jerusalem will be part of two different nations, that there shouldn’t be roads linking them?

This notion is an absurd one. If anything, roads help peace. They are means of communication (ask the Romans). But let’s turn this around for a moment. What if Israel were to demolish all roads out of Gaza; would Peace Now approve of this?

Considering the left deny just how much aid Israel delivers to Gaza each week, and denies that these ‘Palestinians’ are allowed medical treatment inside Israel, Peace Now shouldn’t have a problem in demolishing these roads?

The article continues “Peace Now representatives argue that the "road's current route isn't legal, since the plan designates occupied territory for permanent infrastructures for the occupying power, while completely disregarding the needs of the Palestinian residents in Beit Hanina and the area."”

This is interesting! This is the first time I’ve ever heard that an allegedly undeveloped area would suffer because of increased methods of transportation to more prosperous and industrious areas. Links which could provide more business and trade, a link tourists could easily use (provided the Arab occupiers in Judea & Samaria stop attacking and killing strangers and the non-Muslim indigenous inhabitants).

The real reason the far left doesn’t want these roads built is the same reason the PA dictatorship doesn’t want these roads: to keep the conflict alive. And the main way to do that is via control of (Arab) public opinion¹. 

With all the Nazi-style propaganda broadcast by the PA-controlled media, Mahmud Abbas keeps power by doing what the surrounding Arab dictators want. And that is to keep this fictitious ‘Palestinian’ people fighting and killing Jews. The state of Jordan, which denies these Arab refugees their basic human rights (by not absorbing them as Israel absorbed the 850,000 Jewish refugees ethnically cleansed from Arab lands in 1948), keep the conflict alive.

The thinking behind this "evil Zionist road colonisation" project is that if these ‘Palestinians’ gain access to an easy method of transportation to central Jerusalem (especially from the West Bank), they will come to see the propaganda that they’re fed on a daily basis as wrong, and that Jews and Christians can be trading/business partners, and possibly even human.

This is my best guess. Of course there are major cultural obstacles to such a positive outcome (such as jihad; and killing Jews tends to annoy them, for some reason), and considering that genocidal, slave-capturing Muslims first gained access to Africa via Arab tradesmen (who became useful spies when planning their attacks), one wonders in this instance who has the better idea!, the left or right?! 

Footnotes:

^1. The Strong Horse: Power, Politics, and the Clash of Arab Civilizations