Learning Your Left From Right

Definition

Both Left and Right Wing extremists are ideological and prejudiced. To take it even further they are supremacist as well; the Right basing their prejudice on race. The left base their prejudice on 'the cause', the cause being the belief that Socialism can only do good, and is the only good for mankind; anyone against Socialism is against humanity, therefore 'right wing', therefore beneath contempt.

Recent Trends

This erroneous belief and self-righteousness has led to a popularisation (once again) in society and a shift to far Left outlook; from being about supposed humanitarian concerns, or supposed benefits to all mankind, to being simply selective and reactionary. Reactionary against capitalism, selective in its outrage. This can therefore be categorised as post-Socialist.

This new stance has seen the Left begin to support the kind of ideologies which holds principles the Left itself claims to be against.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yodp0DSI85k

Myths

But actually this isn't anything new. It is quite a testament to delusions which still stand today, about the benign nature of Socialism, that people are not prejudiced against Socialism in the same way they are against fascism. The Communist regimes were responsible for almost 100 million deaths in the 20th century.

One could argue that these regimes did not adhere to the principles of Marxism, and were simply dictatorships using the guise of Socialism as a front.

Marx said that "In order for man to realize his potential and to lead a life befitting his true nature, he must find the means to rid himself of the shackles of alienation."

http://www.mmisi.org/ma/30_01/coby.pdf (PDF File)

This isn't an essay about Socialist or Marxist theory. But from the above quote, we can gauge that 'alienation' is a bad thing (without getting into what alienation actually means) and alienation is the obstacle Marx saw to attaining a 'perfect' society. But the quote from Marx contains a clause, it states that in order to get to this ideal, man must rid himself of these shackles. So by Marx's very teachings, we see that 'Socialist Regime' is a contradiction in terms. For when a centralised regime attempts to rid its people of these shackles - such as we saw in Cambodia - it becomes theft. It becomes a raping and pillaging of society.

In Cambodia, children were separated from parents in order that they not learn the 'corrupt knowledge' handed down from generation to generation; and the Cambodians were moved from towns and cities into the countryside. Also too was the Cambodian currency which was abolished. Anyone who did not obey orders was executed on the spot. Anyone hiding food to give to their loved ones was at risk of death. In this sense, it was a form of sin to feed oneself instead of giving to the regime; the higher cause.

This brings us back to the opening statement about the totalitarianism of Socialists and are just as capable of eliminating anyone not willing to die for the ideology. In a more realistic world socialism is simply another form of fascism.

In Western societies we have a direct relation to Cambodia with a similar process underway, since the 'Radical '60s', to lead us once again to this totalitarianism. The Cambodian example is just political correctness, but much further down the line.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R2JLONVIN9ICF0/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm

The Battle Of The Civilisations Resumes

The battle at the Gates of Vienna, in 1683, is an historic battle in the history of the West and Islam. This battle was the beginning of Islam's decline in Europe, and the world.

Soon after this defeat came the Industrial Revolution which saw Western technology give the Europeans an unfair advantage on the battlefield. It almost ensured the colonial power's rule and success in its conquests.

From what started with the battle at the Gates of Vienna culminated with the First World War: the complete destruction of the Islamic world, not only militarily, but ideologically too with Seljuk Attaturk abolishing the Caliphate and accepting the Western concept of democracy (a method of rule antithetical to Islamic rule: Shari'ah law).

Political writer and commentator Christopher Hitchens calculates the precise date of this battle of 1683, to be the eleventh of September, of that year.

"...it is extremely unlikely to me, that the forces that wish to restore the Caliphate [Al-Qaida, Taliban, Muslim Brotherhood etc] which believe in sign, symbol and dream; and superstition and prophecy, picked a 'nothing' date for their grandest of all operations. It may be one of the many things that they know about but that we do not."

(the above quote from an excerpt of video two: 2 min 40sec)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVSXzDYYDjA

Material Hitchens found whilst researching his book on Thomas Paine's The Rights of Man.

Further to this, Robert Spencer gives further illumination on the topic:

"The jihad advance into Europe did end in 1683, and then we didn't see, at least not on that scale, jihad warfare until relatively recently. At least not until the last few decades of the 20th Century.

Many people believe, that at that point this was because of some kind of reformation in the Islamic world that led to the disguarding the ideology that had led these conquests to begin with.

...in 1683 it simply became impossible for this jihad to be persued because of the weakness of the Ottoman Empire, and the decline generally, of the Islamic civilisation. It was not a matter of setting aside these [Koranic] doctrines, it was simply not being strong enough to persue them.

Now in our own generation, because of the Iranian Revolution, because of Saudi petro-dollars, it has again become possible to take up this war again. And so people believe because we have not seen this on such a scale, until the last few decades, that it is something new. It is not. It is something radically traditional. It is something very old, it is something deeply rooted in the Islamic religion, and it is being reasserted today."

Robert Spencer



I wonder, with the Industrial Revolution only a short while after the battle at the gates of Vienna, if the Turks had won and the Ottoman and Islam's appalling record of oppression, subjugation
and slavery had taken hold in Europe, where we'd all be now?

No Renaissance, no Enlightenment, no literature, no art...

Europe seems poised to be the first to find out...